Much Ado About Nothing by Shakespeare


I liked this one, not as much as A Midsummer Nights Dream, but still liked it; it didn’t have quite as humorous a quality. I thought the set up for Benedick and Beatrice was really good and enjoyed Beatrice’s adamant refusal of her love. Likewise Claudio and Hero were a great pair and the trickery played on them by John the Bastard was well played out, although I found it a little confusing when Dogberry was investigating the situation.

Also the $0.99c Kindle version I got was crappy and had html scripting in it, and it didn’t have much in the way of consistent formatting. That aside, it was a good short read. I give it a 7/10 and imagine the play would be a whole lot better.

The Orthodox Heretic by Peter Rollins



This is another book I feel like I’ve been reading for months. It’s a collection of stories complied to make you think deeply about various aspects of life, love and faith etc. I read this after finishing Rollins’ book ‘How (Not) to Speak of God’ (which was amazing) and this, to be honest, felt like a bit of a chore. It just didn’t seem to have that same punch-in-your-gut effect, or maybe I just wasn’t in the theological and philosophical frame of mind I needed to be in. That being said however it is a good book to use for a group discussion; to read the story/parable and discuss the message or the moral of the story. I probably shouldn’t compare the two books but I have, and it’s a bit hard not to considering the weightiness of ‘How (not) to…’ which I would highly recommend.

So overall I give it a 5/10.

20,000 Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne


Thank god it’s finally over! I feel like I’ve been reading this book for months. Not that I didn’t like it, because I did, well the first 2/3 were fantastic and then tedium set in and it ambled around towards the dismal end.

I loved Professor Aronnax and his endless barrage of questions and insights about the Nautilus and the untapped underwater world. Captain Nemo also was extremely likable for his wise, misanthropic, phlegmatic and confident personality. I was captivated by the Nautilus; a reading room with an ample supply of sea-cigars – Fantastic! The innovation of Verne’s insight and imagination was well thought out and we explored first-hand the wonders of the sea with the professor. However the descriptions of different species of fish and mammals did start to resemble The Origin Of Species in it’s tedious exhaustive detail. I was hooked for most of the book. But I determined to finish it, not something I usually do, but I persevered. I felt like it became repetitive and at the point they found the cavity under the volcano I was ready to move on.

Overall however I did enjoy it, it could have easily been punchier at half the length. My rating is 6.5/10.

A midsummer night’s dream by William Shakespeare



A wonderfully fun and laughable tale, beautiful and all of the characters have that ‘jump off the page’ quality. I loved it and it is now, without a doubt, one of my favourite stories.

The plot was brilliant. My two favourite scenes were, firstly, that of the woods; when Demetruis and Lysander are under the fairy love spell and Helena thought that they, with Hermia, were making sport of her. It was actually laugh out loud funny. And the other part that got me giggling was when Snout the tinker acts as a wall in the play at the wedding ceremony:

“In this same interlude it doth befall 

That I, one Snout by name, present a wall;  

And such a wall, as I would have you think, 

That had in it a crannied hole or chink, 

Through which the lovers, Pyramus and Thisby, 

Did whisper often very secretly. 

This loam, this rough-cast and this stone doth show 

That I am that same wall; the truth is so: 

And this the cranny is, right and sinister, 

Through which the fearful lovers are to whisper.”

The running commentary of ”The Mechanical’s’ play by the Duke, his fiance Hippolyta and the four lovers (primarily Lysander) was really great and you could visualize the banter.

What more can I say, a timeless classic. I would love to see the stage show. I give this a maximum rating of 10/10.

In the year 2889 by Jules/Michel Verne


A fun frolic into the future by Jules, or more likely his son, Michel Verne. This book is a glimpse (30 pages) into a day in the life of Fritz Napoleon Smith, editor of the Earth Chronicle, in the year 2889.

The story is very short and sharp and could easily have been fleshed out in many ways. However, it was amusing to see Verne’s imaginations of the future.

Elements were very skimmed over, such as the unsuccessful resuscitation of a hundred year old dead doctor, which frankly was a bit odd. My favorite bit of the book, just near the end, is when they use the ‘Piano Electro-Reckoner, where the most complex calculations can be made in a few seconds.’ Also a variation of modern day Skype was through ‘the transmission of images by means of sensitive mirrors connected by wires,’ – brilliant.

Oh yeah, and instead of reading the news online like we do now: “Instead of being printed, the Earth Chronicle is every morning spoken to subscribers… each subscriber owns a phonograph, and to this instrument he leaves the task of gathering the news whenever he happens not to be in a mood to listen directly himself. As for purchasers of single copies, they can at a very trifling cost learn all that is in the paper of the day at any of the innumerable phonographs set up nearly everywhere.”

So overall it was a quick and amusing read, more than likely not for everyone though. I give it a 4.5/10.

Quick bit of self promotion

Hey all. Just wanted to quickly say that I’ve started a new blog; one where I plan on doing more writing. I still plan to keep reading and reviewing books here just as much, but you can check out my new one here



This is a book by Demetri Martin

This-Is-a-Book-Martin-Demetri-9780446539708The good thing, possibly it’s only redeeming factor, is that it’s made of short bits you can pick up sporadically.

I have seen a few of Demetri’s videos online which have not been overly bad, and sometimes quite funny. So I was hoping this book would be a laugh. Not just a laugh but I hoped for an intelligent chuckle as he poked fun at the mundane and weird in our everyday lives from his thoughtful perspective. However I think I laughed, and not even out loud, once; and I can’t even remember why. That being said it was very American, which is not a humor I really get. My thought about almost every bit of this book was ‘Americans would find this funny’, I just didn’t though.

Some of the pictures/drawings were mildly amusing and I didn’t mind the story about Socrates, but overall the book was a chore to get through.

It’s not a great book in my opinion. But if you like American humor then you might enjoy it more than I did. Overall I give this a rating of 1.5/10. Very low I know, but not my cup of tea.

See below for the tone of the book

Demetri Martin 009